For a number of a long time I have been promoting our very own readers to alter natural data from their webcams to Adobe’s DNG structure.

For a number of a long time I have been promoting our very own readers to alter natural data from their webcams to Adobe’s DNG structure.

Within my DNG vs natural information from 2010, We described reasons why using DNG over sore earned awareness – it made simple document control, lead to smaller data (when squeezed or any time enclosed JPEG image size had been diminished) and seemed like the best way to future-proof sore documents. But as hours died, larger quality cameras were introduced so I launched discovering various other post-processing selection, I understood that DNG received a good number of major negative aspects that forced me to be reject they. Outlined in this article, I will revisit the DNG format and raise several of my questions on why it might not are the ideal decision that I once imagined it has been.

Let’s check out some instance situations and determine exactly what advantages and drawbacks the DNG structure possesses compared to sore documents.

Table of items

1) DNG Conversion Increase Workflow Experience

Whether I opt to transform my favorite natural data files to DNG upon importance or at a further place time, the transformation steps adds a very important problem to my transfer some time and merely issues my personal workflow. Continue reading For a number of a long time I have been promoting our very own readers to alter natural data from their webcams to Adobe’s DNG structure.